summary

Simon Sinek - What Business Can Learn From the Military | Simon Sinek at Entreleadership 2019

Thumbnail of the video “Simon Sinek - What Business Can Learn From the Military | Simon Sinek at Entreleadership 2019”
Community upload. AI output has not been independently verified.

Short Summary

Main recommendation: Leaders should evaluate and promote people on trust as well as performance, because high performers with low trust are toxic to teams, and the military, where stakes make human factors visible, shows this clearly. Simon Sinek argues that business treats trust as a soft skill and ignores it in hiring and promotion decisions, even though high-performing organizations treat trust as more important than performance.

Key Points

  • Sinek says the military is not fundamentally different from business, but its high stakes make leadership lessons easier to see.
  • Military culture is deeply human, with members describing each other in terms like love, brotherhood, and sisterhood, while business calls these human qualities "soft skills."
  • Navy SEAL Richard Tiffany described evaluating candidates on two axes, performance and trust, and the team's view is that a high performer with low trust is a toxic team member.
  • Sinek says businesses measure performance with many metrics but have minimal or no metrics for trust, so they keep promoting and celebrating high performers of low trust, building toxicity into teams.
  • Ask any team who they trust most and they will usually name the same person, often their best natural leader, even if that person is not the top performer.

Details Worth Noting

  • Concrete instructions: Evaluate team members on two separate axes, performance (how good they are at the job) and trust (their character and whether you would trust them with your life, money, or family).
  • Concrete instructions: Rank people in the four quadrants: high performer and high trust (keep and promote), high trust with medium or low performance (coach them first), high performer with low trust (do not promote; treat as a toxic risk), and low performer with low trust (consider letting them go).
  • Concrete instructions: For a low performer with high trust, coach their performance; if they are uncoachable, Sinek suggests asking them to leave.
  • Concrete instructions: For a high performer with low trust, recognize that a skilled salesperson is not automatically a good manager and teach leadership before expecting them to lead others.
  • Concrete instructions: To identify trustworthy people, ask the team "who do you trust more than anybody, who's got your back no matter what?" and watch for the same name to come up repeatedly.
  • Sinek notes that the performance-versus-trust framing is a relative scale; a medium performer with high trust can be preferable to a high performer with low trust.
  • Sinek's central claim is that the highest-performing organizations treat trust as more important than performance, which he says business does not currently do.

Bottom Line

Judge people by character as rigorously as by results, because a brilliant but untrustworthy performer can quietly damage a whole team.