summary

Chris Voss & The Black Swan Group - "I" vs "You" in Negotiation | Chris Voss

Thumbnail of the video “Chris Voss & The Black Swan Group - "I" vs "You" in Negotiation | Chris Voss”
Community upload. AI output has not been independently verified.

Short Summary

Main recommendation: when labeling someone's emotions in a negotiation, open with "you" or hedged phrasings such as "it seems," "it sounds," "it looks," or "you sound," and avoid "what I'm hearing is," because each word, including "I," "you," and "we," carries a different emotional impact on the other person. The speaker frames this as subtle but powerful, and says that understanding these differences lets a negotiator choose words deliberately, with practice making the choice possible almost instantly.

Key Points

  • Every word has an emotional impact on the listener, and the only words without impact are those said to a dead person, according to the speaker.
  • "I" tends to interrupt the other person's thinking and pull attention back to the speaker, while "you" gently draws the other person's attention in.
  • The speaker compares emotional control to breathing: a person can hold their breath only so long, and similarly has limited control over their limbic system, so telling oneself to calm down works only within a narrow window.
  • The same story told with "you" instead of "I" feels different, even though only one word changed, which the speaker uses to demonstrate the effect.
  • No word or phrase is inherently good or bad; its effect depends on how and when it is used.

Details Worth Noting

  • Concrete instructions:
    • To begin a label, use hedged phrasings: "it seems," "it sounds," "it looks," or "it feels."
    • Switch the opening word from "I" to "you" when describing the other person's state, such as "you seem," "you sound," or "you look."
    • Avoid "what I'm hearing is" as a labeling opener, since the speaker describes it as improper use of active listening with poor structure and timing.
    • Reserve phrases like "I know you're angry" for emotional moments where they fit, rather than using them as a default opener.
    • Practice the substitution by rewriting the same statement with "I" and then with "you," and notice how each version lands.
    • The speaker's exercises include fill-in-the-blank slide structures that participants hand-write now and later.
  • The speaker's background as an FBI agent who trained at Quantico for two weeks to become a hostage negotiator provides the context for the examples.
  • The speaker describes the "scent team" as the FBI hostage negotiators who flew around the world working kidnappings, a group he wanted to join by the end of his training.
  • The speaker says the group is still working out specific descriptions of emotional moments, including when and how to create them.

Bottom Line

Word choice in negotiation changes how the other person feels in real time, so deliberately selecting "you" or hedged labels over "I" can shift the emotional dynamic, and practice makes that selection quick.